Even if a bank is offering financing for DAPL, they are still culpable of putting in place a disastrous pipeline, one for which there is no need. They are still supporting the pipeline no matter what anyone in the banking industry claims. The interest they earn makes them partners in the pipeline. No EIS listed in the Federal Register as of yet. What are they waiting for? Protest appeared to misstate role of US Bank's role in Dakota Access pipeline Cost of policing DAPL tallied over $22mn. N. Dakota wants feds to 'pony up' Dakota Access Pipeline Battle in Deep Freeze. But for How Long? The Dakota Access and Japanese Banks (YouTube) CFIF Submits FOIA Request on Dakota Access Pipeline Decision Dakota Access Pipeline protests will continue despite construction halting Are Ohio officials calling Standing Rock protesters terrorists? To uphold religious freedom in 2017, do small things with great love Celebrating President Obama'...
Used to be a blog for AP English Language and Composition, but now has transcended beyond that.